Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MattDamonSpace's commentslogin

/s I assume but it’s crazy to me that LG runs on the watch

Apple TV 4K can’t run the Liquid Glass interface without stuttering, turning off transparency restores fluid (heh!) animations.

Sir a Linux desktop recommendation for non-tech-literate elders is just silly

Sir no sir. I believe entirely the opposite. If they're tech illiterate then they don't have the entrenched knowledge that is the only thing keeping most people within the Windows ecosystem.

A Linux install that meets the basic needs of the user is perfecto!

Less so recently just due to time constraints, but I'm generally the technical person in my family group, and I've lost enough touch with Windows that troubleshooting it is increasingly difficult. If they need me to 'format and reinstall' they're getting Linux unless they have a very specific need that only Windows can cater to.


It's getting less silly every month! So many people in that boat only use the web browser anyway.

With a well-supported hardware configuration and a working web browser, even a non-techie may have a more stable experience than they would with Windows.

That has as much to do with the decline of Windows as with the ascent of desktop Linux, but still.


Why? As long as you use a regular desktop distro, it's simple, pleasant and easy to use. This was already true 10+ years ago.

Sir, have you tried doing it? Works great.

It isnt silly. We did this with my 92 yo grandma back in the 2010s. She had a browser, an email client, word processor, printer.

Bulletproof, immune to all the apps and malware. She couldnt break it.


The sentence prior explicitly says this. There’s no dishonesty here.

“Even fully autonomous weapons (…) may prove critical for our national defense”

FWIW there’s simply no way around this in the end. If your even attempts to create such weapons, the only possible defensive counter is weapons of a similar nature.


To stop a bullet flying at you you need a shield not another bullet.

Still a wildly different thesis than the “juniors are fucked, ladder’s been raised”


just to be clear: from my standpoint it's the worst period ever being a junior in tech, you are not "fucked" if you are junior, but hard times are ahead of you.


OTOH, as a junior, you haven't learned all the wrong lessons that don't apply anymore, and you have fewer responsibilities than the seniors.


That still doesn’t sound employable


This case has always been made for juniors but it's almost always the opposite that's true. There's always some fad that the industry is over-indexing on. Senior developers tend to be less susceptible to falling for it but non-technical staff and junior developers are not

Whether its a hotlang, LLMs, or some new framework. Juniors like to dive right in because the promise of getting a competitive edge against people much more experienced than you is too tantalizing. You really want it to be true


Like what


Some things take very little time and effort to manifest into the world today that used to take a great deal. So one of the big changes is around whether some things are worth doing at all.

Note: I'm not taking any particular side of the "Juniors are F**d" vs "no they're not" argument.


Thank god there’s no programmers union ffs


Too useful


And also more secure unfortunately, when you need to unlock your phone in public for example.


Until one person or one CCTV camera catches the code over your shoulder and you're done.


That is what they meant


The same public where you're constantly leaving your fingerprints, where your face is being constantly recorded and scanned into multiple facial recognition systems, where your DNA is being constantly shed? When everything needed to unlock your phone can be taken off of your corpse or just reconstructed from what you leave everywhere you go you're not really "secure".


Nobody is going to all that trouble to unlock my phone, they'll just beat me with a hammer until I unlock it for them


If your threat model includes abduction and torture, then you probably don’t need to worry about your rights to begin with, and probably shouldn’t be using a regular cell phone for anything important


Exactly! Biometrics have never been less secure than they are now. It's approaching Social Security number levels of insecure. LOL


It's like using a password that can never be reset, writing it on a stack of post-it notes, then tearing one off and throwing it over your shoulder every 10 feet you travel


Ffs, taking usable fingerprints is not that easy

Facial recognition cameras don’t use or give you the same data that FaceID’s 3D depth mapping FaceID uses, besides few cameras get close enough to practically reconstruct a useful 3D mask that could fool it.

And if you’re a corpse why would you care?


terrorists don’t have $45 each


It's meant to deter poor people, but it sounds better the way you said it.


They also claim 2x usage from December (though 2x a tiny amount is still a tiny amount)


You can just not use them


First, op should mention which ones but they won't.


Evaporation?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: