Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | blackqueeriroh's commentslogin

That was not why they cared. The6 cared because compute resources were incredibly scarce.

That changed. The following generation was still taught by those original folks, but they came up with a mythos around it.


Please do continue to waste energy on doing something that will do nothing but allow you to feel superior about yourself. In fact, you will probably waste more energy than Electron ever has.

There is no way to do E2EE on a traditional social media platform with user-generated content and comply with existing US law.

You can’t moderate an E2EE platform.


All of Meta’s major properties (Messenger, Instagram, WhatsApp) support E2EE messaging.

Pretty sure that for Meta the impossibility to moderate E2EE was the point. It’s cheaper to shrug than pay content moderators.

Aside from the fact that you can get Metadata and that some communication frequently happens outside of E2EE - what US law do you believe mandates moderation? I'm curious.

What law do you believe supports your perspective?

This is an intentionally vague law, and seems like the governor is more than happy to call for amendments: https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AB-1043-Si...

I think it’s a gross failing on the part of the state to intentionally _pass_ a bad/vague law and then ask for amendments. If you can’t write a good law, then don’t pass it. Corporations already do enough beta testing on people and the government certainly shouldn’t beta test laws.

Amendment 1: Parents must parent first. State must not nanny.

Nothing about this law restricts what a parent is allowed to do with respect to their children. If a parent wants to set up a device or account for their kid and set the age of the account to 18+, that does not violate the law.

The bill affects operating systems and apps, requiring them to have only the most basic feature necessary to implement age-based restrictions, and to make it an official platform-wide API instead of each app implementing their own age verification scheme. But parents remain free to use or ignore the age setting at their own discretion.


Wait, so, say I build XYZ Distro of Linux, but dotn want to cater to children, am I still required to implement a way for setting up a DoB?

Even if say I am based in timbuktu, but allow for my ISO to be downloadede bye a resident of the state of california?


Please, source this ridiculous claim

Location: https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/data/en/location-service...

> To use features such as these, you must enable Location Services on your iPhone and give your permission to each app or website before it can receive location data from Location Services

> By enabling Location Services for your devices, you agree and consent to the transmission, collection, maintenance, processing, and use of your location data and location search queries by Apple and its partners and licensees to provide and improve location-based and road traffic-based products and services.

Android and every other consumer general purpose OS lets you read GPS coordinates from the sensor without telling anyone.

App installs: Any app installed from the App Store obviously tells Apple you installed it. Apple does certificate verification for every side-loaded app, where Apple is the CA. There is no way to install an app on iOS without telling Apple.

Android and every other consumer general purpose OS lets you install apps without telling anyone.



I’m confused because to me that article just said the phone knows a lot about itself, things like what applications are installed, and if someone gets into the phone they can use forensic tools to know those things too. I didn’t see anything about Apple getting that information and nothing about Macs. The location stuff is very well known and is an inherent property of any modern networked device, unfortunately.


Bro that’s WhatsApp. Meta is known for their dirty mobile code

Sure, but now double the team size. Double it again.

Suddenly that $40k is quite reasonable because you’ll never pay another dollar for st least 2-3 years.


Would you?

2-3 years ago people were fantasizing on running local models on a consumer nvidia RTX GPU.


Lmao bro compilers aren’t deterministic either

This is such a distortion of the word "deterministic" that it's effectively false.

could you expand on this a little? As far as I know it's a bug in rustc gcc and llvm if the outputs are not deterministic

I was having dinner with a friend yesterday who told me that lock free data structures aren’t lock free since they lock on the hardware level. He also had a thing to say about compilers in C++.

He said something like: it’s crazy that you have the C++ standard but then also how a compiler implements that standard. And then it still matters how that compiler is implemented on a particular architecture! It’s always different and the annoying thing is that this is permutative. This is why we use X86-64 Intel CPUs at <name company> and <name compiler> (I forgot the name). That simplifies it but you still need to know 3 things. He also was frustrated how lock free data structures and memory reordering are 2 completely different concepts in practice but not in C++ but I didn’t fully follow him. I wrote 100 hours in C++ so I was already happy I understood everything else.

But based on his rant I can sort of see why compilers feel not deterministic.


Don't bother. They're going to claim that cosmic radiation can alter bits so compiler determinism is comparable to LLM. I'd rather AI evangelists claim determinism is not required to build decent software than perform the mental gymnastics required to make these comments.

This is fundamentally incorrect.

It’s very odd to hear you complain about age verification but then be fine with ruining the porn industry

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: