Quantstamp said it was exploitable. Nomad falsely claimed it wasn’t. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jxi on Aug 2, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Nomad drained of $150m due to a coding mistake Quantstamp said it was exploitable. Nomad falsely claimed it wasn’t.

mhluongo on Aug 2, 2022 [–]

They're two distinct issues in two distinct contracts, AFAICT.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact