Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I do think that there's some meta-skills involved here that are useful, in the same way that some people have good "Google-fu". Some of it is portable, some of it isn't.

I think if you orient your experimentation right you can think of some good tactics that are helpful even when you're not using AI assistance. "Making this easier for the robot" can often align with "making this easier for the humans" as well. It's a decent forcing function

Though I agree with the sentiment. People who have been doing this for less than a year convinced that they have some permanent lead over everyone.

I think a lot about my years being self taught programming. Years spent spinning my wheels. I know people who after 3 months of a coding bootcamp were much further than me after like ... 6 years of me struggling through material.



> in the same way that some people have good "Google-fu"

or, perhaps, in the same way that google-fu over time became devalued as a skill as Google became less useful for power users in order to cater to the needs of the unskilled, it will not really be a portable skill at all, because it is in the end a transitory or perhaps easily attainable skill once the technology is evenly distributed.


Perhaps, but in Google's case that's, what, 10 years of value I got out of knowing how to write good searches? Probably more honestly.

Everything is temporary to some extent.


Are the early tricks for LLMs still useful today?


I mean the high level stuff is still there right? Be straightforward, leave the right kind of pointers into the thing, say the right kind of things.

But... I guess nowadays you can be vague and it'll get the gist of it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: